}
———
We also saw that \mfunctionlabeltext is inconsistent with ConTeXt
\labeltext because the former has a style attached to it, so
\mfunctionlabeltext should be removed from math-ini.mkiv and
\mfunction{\mathlabeltext } should be used instead when needed.
To go even further
{\mfunction{\mathlabeltext{#1}}}
———
Thus with the 1st definition of \mfunction (and \mfunctionlabeltext), the
definition of a math function for the user is a bit complicated (he has to
write \normalmathop \nolimits in addition to \mfunction or
\mfunctionlabeltext, unless Hans decides
should be removed, and
\mfunctionlabeltext should be removed as well and one should directly use
the already defined \mathlabeltext instead, for these 3 reasons:
I strongly disagree to this. These are two completely different issues
(wanting a macro to tag multiletter variable names vs a macro
be removed, and
\mfunctionlabeltext should be removed as well and one should directly
use the already defined \mathlabeltext instead, for these 3 reasons:
1. Every command containing the word 'labeltext' should not have a style
attached to it.
2. The word 'function' is misleading because \mfunction
be removed as well and one should directly use
the already defined \mathlabeltext instead, for these 3 reasons:
1. Every command containing the word 'labeltext' should not have a style
attached to it.
2. The word 'function' is misleading because \mfunction and
\mfunctionlabeltext do not create a \mathop
Sorry, I did 3 typos in my previous post.
— First typo:
3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setuplabeltext is also more consistent
with the current \labeltext that works with \setuplabeltext.
3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setupmathlabeltext is also more
consistent with the current \labeltext
